Border Problems, School Problems, and What the Two Share.
I began rereading E.D. Hirsch's CULTURAL LITERACY. Wow. He just says it all so much better than I can.
But he got me thinking about the connection between school problems and border problems. At bottom is the principle that a nation survives by passing on to future generations those things that make it great--not only principles and skills, but also content. And our nation is struggling on two fronts: American-born children are not being taught all that they should, and foreign-born immigrants are not being fully assimilated. These two problems are one.
SAT verbal scores are dropping, not because children are not excellent readers but because they are unfamiliar with so much of the material that writers of English expect an audience to know. In other words, while literate in the sense that they can pronounce the words, the kids are illiterate in the sense of understanding their meaning--because they cannot decode the various allusions and references contained in the passage. So years after Dewey, citing Rousseau, convinced American schools and schools of education to teach only skills without regard for content, men like Hirsch have helped educators to remember the importance of shared knowledge. It's the Venn diagram: you can only communicate about things with which both parties are at least vaugely familiar. Schools are realizing they should teach the right books, the most important history, and that content is crucial. And at some point children should pick up not only our nation's shared history, but also a passionate love for its extraordinary and unique greatness: a City on a hill.
The same should be done for immigrants. Not only their children, but themselves--they need to learn not only that America is a land of opportunity (which they apparently knew before they arrived), but they need to be shown why. And there are reasons--it's not just a happy accident. If immigrants could be thoroughly schooled in this culture, if they could be made culturally literate, then most would also become assimilated--patriotically assimilated.
Peggy Noonan has great thoughts on much of this here. (I dig her wandering, right-brained, totally non-lawyer approach. She's a great writer.)
But he got me thinking about the connection between school problems and border problems. At bottom is the principle that a nation survives by passing on to future generations those things that make it great--not only principles and skills, but also content. And our nation is struggling on two fronts: American-born children are not being taught all that they should, and foreign-born immigrants are not being fully assimilated. These two problems are one.
SAT verbal scores are dropping, not because children are not excellent readers but because they are unfamiliar with so much of the material that writers of English expect an audience to know. In other words, while literate in the sense that they can pronounce the words, the kids are illiterate in the sense of understanding their meaning--because they cannot decode the various allusions and references contained in the passage. So years after Dewey, citing Rousseau, convinced American schools and schools of education to teach only skills without regard for content, men like Hirsch have helped educators to remember the importance of shared knowledge. It's the Venn diagram: you can only communicate about things with which both parties are at least vaugely familiar. Schools are realizing they should teach the right books, the most important history, and that content is crucial. And at some point children should pick up not only our nation's shared history, but also a passionate love for its extraordinary and unique greatness: a City on a hill.
The same should be done for immigrants. Not only their children, but themselves--they need to learn not only that America is a land of opportunity (which they apparently knew before they arrived), but they need to be shown why. And there are reasons--it's not just a happy accident. If immigrants could be thoroughly schooled in this culture, if they could be made culturally literate, then most would also become assimilated--patriotically assimilated.
Peggy Noonan has great thoughts on much of this here. (I dig her wandering, right-brained, totally non-lawyer approach. She's a great writer.)
4 Comments:
I couldn't agree more. I don't comment much but I do enjoy your Blog.
By the way, I may not pass the word verification but then you will never know if I don't.
By Anonymous, at 9:20 PM, April 05, 2006
Always the genuises are wracked with self-doubt. If ew can make men out of two boys, I know he can get past a little word verification...
I would quit my day/night job if I could write like Peggy Noonan. I actually read that before you suggested it this time...
By The Doctor, at 10:24 PM, April 05, 2006
I'm sure you know she wrote many of Reagan's best speeches, esp the one following the Challenger disaster, and Bush the Elder's Thousand Points of Light speech. Yet, her column is so different from those of, well--everyone. Sometimes I think her quircky stories are disconnected and meaningful only to her, but when she's on, there's no one better.
By the way, she's the only person to whom I have ever sent a fan letter. (After reading WHAT I SAW AT THE REVOLUTION.)
Thanks for the comments. Good to see you, ew--glad you can see the net again, and exercise, and resume your duties....
By S., at 7:35 AM, April 06, 2006
Ahhhhhh, the duties. That's the
best part! Yesterday he repaired
my garage door and bought and unloaded mulch and did some other
significant puttering around in the garage and at Home Depot. (I'm
SURE it was significant.)
It is good to have him back.
By Anonymous, at 7:57 AM, April 06, 2006
Post a Comment
<< Home