Doing Church in the Information Age
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/acb2b/acb2b637cdeabcdd87589691615d1bdfbdc19ff8" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0d22/b0d22c893fb9906815ec96d754251b69b6c85f37" alt=""
It's different today. Modern church members are often as well-educated as their pastors (or similarly degreed, anyway). And as for the news of our day, it would seem lay people in general have more time for reading and interpreting widely-sourced news than their pastors. My pastor is a busier man than most. He can't possibly spend the kind of time on the net or listening to talk radio that I can. Nor can he spend all his time reading books. And frankly--what pastor would want to? My pastor once told several of us that he had remodeled the office and removed the built-in bookshelves of the prior pastor. He tapped his laptop. "I've got all the books I need, right in here." I was chagrined, having forever dreamed of built-in bookshelves. But rabid bibliophilia (doesn't it sound like a disease?) is not a prequisite for effective ministry. Frankly, my own bookishness is a hindrance as often as it helps at church. (For every Sunday school lesson enriched, there's a committee meeting where everyone thinks I'm crazy because I don't share their priorities. Thank you, Neil Postman.)
Then there's the massive proliferation of other ministries. Everyone in Houston can listen to half a dozen Christian radio stations, and two Christian television stations--even without cable or satellite systems. Surely you could listen to fifty sermons a week if you were so inclined. And with the internet, you can listen to sermons all day, every day. And you can hear the very best in church music, new worship, old worship, or whatever you want. There's James Dobson, Chuck Colson, Janet Parschall, Chuck Swindoll, Hank Hannegraff, Beth Moore (can't forget her) and dozens and dozens of others on radio and TV and internet outlets 24/7. And there are Christian movie reviewers (Movieguide now has at least one competitor), "family coaches," financial ministries, health and diet experts, experts on preschool, or caring for aging parents (somebody send me a link--ha!), experts on guiding your child's education, whether home-schooled or otherwise, and many more.
But after a week immersed in this sea of information--listening to great speakers, great music, reading the best analysis and the best books, having deep and heavy discussions on the web--where writing the occasional 'comment' may take longer than we allow the pastor to speak--arriving at church on Sunday, it might be easy to shrug your shoulders after the sermon and say, "Oh, well. That left me sort of flat."
And it occured to me--why do we come to church? To hear a great message? Do we expect the pastor to beat out the competition in a world saturated with information? To be more entertaining, more insightful, more passionate, but more dispassionate, more everything--than whatever else we've taken in all week? Is that fair? Is it possible? (Could Beth Moore even live up to that?)
John Eldredge makes it clear: We come to church to fellowship with other believers and to commune with and learn how to love Jesus. We come because we are not autonomous, disconnected people who can pick whatever's most interesting, as if going to church were just another channel on the tube, another bookmark taking you to another distant website. Instead, we are part of a body. And you can't take that lightly. Not just the larger body, but the local one to which you have been called--even if it has seemed dull lately. We stand or fall as a body. We reap what we sow as a body. God's reasons for church attendance do not include being over-stimulated by exciting sermons. If you've read much of the Bible, you know the excitement is knowing God and having a changed life. It's not about the reading experience. Same with sermons.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48996/48996a344ed98776ca746cb658465abe860d5a1c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2bb94/2bb940d87cbf11016073762e56fb613333b90de1" alt=""
3 Comments:
I agree. And with all that being said, I still think Gregg's messages are profound and, for me
at least, just about perfect. I have always loved Colossians, but I never began to really understand its incredible depth - and I know we've still only scratched the surface - until now. He is truly
a gift to us.
(Where's HIS picture???)
By
Anonymous, at 10:49 AM, February 01, 2006
I wasn't talking about Gregg! I mean, I certainly wasn't criticizing him. And anyway, there are not many Voddie's on Google, so it was easier to find a good photo. But I'll add the G-man, for you. (But I wasn't talking about him.)
By
S., at 11:09 AM, February 01, 2006
Here's a photo I haven't the nerve to post:
http://www.baptiststandard.com/postnuke/pics/4_19/congresso_matte.jpg
By
S., at 11:14 AM, February 01, 2006
Post a Comment
<< Home