United 93: Even-Handed; Two Thumbs Up.
I saw United 93 last night.
It begins with the sound of hushed prayers in a language I assume to be Arabic. The opening scene is one of three or four men in their hotel rooms praying and shaving in the pre-dawn hours. Each is nervous and scared for obvious reasons. But as they make their way to the airport, they seem like any other group of travelers. Sure, they're not locals, not WASPS, but they come across as likable as any group of immigrant-students you might take classes with in a college somewhere. The one who ends up piloting the plane is someone I could see myself making conversation with while waiting to board. Nothing about these men seems evil or malicious. If anything, as the film begins they seem devout, earnest, and good. I had read the film treatment was even-handed in this way and watching it, I kept thinking:
I know all the best reasons, of course: an even tone is much more appealing to those who are less partisan, less patriotic, less-jingoistic than I. Remember all those journalists who were afraid to wear flag pins after 9/11 for fear their impartiality and credibility would be impugned? (What impartiality? What credibility?) People like that want an even tone, a movie that makes no judgments, that does not "tell you what to think," that just lets the facts speak for themselves. But Hollywood was not obsessed with moral relativism during World War II. Those movies never made Hitler or the Japanese look like America's moral equivalents. Few Cold War films made Soviets look like our equals. So I thought hard on this throughout the short, well-made film.
It begins with the sound of hushed prayers in a language I assume to be Arabic. The opening scene is one of three or four men in their hotel rooms praying and shaving in the pre-dawn hours. Each is nervous and scared for obvious reasons. But as they make their way to the airport, they seem like any other group of travelers. Sure, they're not locals, not WASPS, but they come across as likable as any group of immigrant-students you might take classes with in a college somewhere. The one who ends up piloting the plane is someone I could see myself making conversation with while waiting to board. Nothing about these men seems evil or malicious. If anything, as the film begins they seem devout, earnest, and good. I had read the film treatment was even-handed in this way and watching it, I kept thinking:
Why not make the bad guys bad? Why not make the heroes heroic? Why be so even-handed?
I know all the best reasons, of course: an even tone is much more appealing to those who are less partisan, less patriotic, less-jingoistic than I. Remember all those journalists who were afraid to wear flag pins after 9/11 for fear their impartiality and credibility would be impugned? (What impartiality? What credibility?) People like that want an even tone, a movie that makes no judgments, that does not "tell you what to think," that just lets the facts speak for themselves. But Hollywood was not obsessed with moral relativism during World War II. Those movies never made Hitler or the Japanese look like America's moral equivalents. Few Cold War films made Soviets look like our equals. So I thought hard on this throughout the short, well-made film.
And later at home I kissed my sleeping wife and kids, thankful I had not had to make the sort of call made by those on board Flight 93. Then I kept looking around, listening, pacing. Checking the locks and wondering what that noise was I just heard. Turns out the even-handed tone left me as spooked as I have been in a long time. Spooked to know that could have been me, spooked that I would have trusted those guys, spooked that I could look pure evil in the face and not know it until it was too late.
Great movie.
P.S. Opening weekend found United 93 no. 2 at the box office.
7 Comments:
I'll be looking out for it, but I wonder if it will even get screened overseas...
By The Doctor, at 4:11 AM, May 01, 2006
Good question, and one you'd know more about than I. But it's a safe bet it won't be the in-flight movie on your way home....
By S., at 7:53 AM, May 01, 2006
dennis - i'm wondering the same thing
italy is pretty much the gold standard for dubbing english films...i just hope i can find it in the original language somewhere
By J C, at 10:09 AM, May 01, 2006
It got great reviews on the news yesterday, and was #2 at the box
office, second to the RV comedy,
which is reputed to be pretty lame.
(But Robin W. always makes me laugh, even when he is totally gross.)
Still, I think it might be hard to
watch.
By Anonymous, at 10:04 AM, May 02, 2006
Aww, say it ain't so!
The movie is not hard to watch because it cuts back and forth between the plane and various air traffic and military rooms. Watching all these varied reactions is interesting. And to me, we win in the end--the good guys win because they prevented a fourth horrible blow to the nation, even though they died in the process. I found the ending sober, but still a victory.
By S., at 10:30 AM, May 02, 2006
robb was seriously confused yesterday night as we sat on my couch after a really long day...to watch tivoed episodes of bernie mac...and as we scrolled through...we saw a film called flight 93...and he was so confused...and said, "how did you get this tivoed so fast...it just came out at the movies?" ...and of course, i blamed my superhero powers...but then i read this post and realized that it's a different movie...well..it's not all that different...basically...thanks a lot...now he KNOWS i'm not a superhero!
By Anonymous, at 10:58 AM, May 03, 2006
Yeah, I think there was a documentary. I overheard teens after the movie complaining because they'd seen the documentary and they were hoping for more blood and gore in the film. (There is both, but not enough for teenaged boys, I guess.)
Let me know what RB thinks--his opinion on all things artistic is always entirely unpredictable to me (except those things he dismisses out of hand--I can predict his reaction to those things).
By S., at 11:24 AM, May 03, 2006
Post a Comment
<< Home